5.2
/ 10
Best DeFi Strategy & Protocol Economics Advisors · Review
Block Analitica
Block Analitica is a DeFi risk firm that sets and monitors risk parameters, onboards collateral and builds risk dashboards for lending protocols.
Best For
Lending and stablecoin protocols that need ongoing collateral risk parameters and monitoring rather than a one-off token design
Headline Cost
Not published
Founded
2019
Rank in category
12 of 15
Last Checked
22 September 2026
Score breakdown
Category rubric →Published research and models · 25%
6.0
Client-confirmed work · 20%
3.6
Recent economics work · 20%
10.0
Conflict-of-interest disclosure · 15%
0.0
Named team · 10%
5.0
Transparent terms · 10%
5.0
A criterion with nothing published scores 0, so a low score often means missing evidence rather than poor work. The headline 5.2 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.
The evidence behind each mark
Scoring rules →| Criterion | Mark | What we found | Source | Checked |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Published research and models · 25% | 6.0 | Regular Substack research and protocol analyses plus public GitHub tooling, but its risk models are not published as open simulations or papers. | blockanalitica.substack.com ↗ | 22 September 2026 |
| Client-confirmed work · 20% | 3.6 | 11 clients named on its site; 4 confirmed by the client side (Sky, Spark, Compound, HyperLend). | docs.hyperlend.finance ↗ | 22 September 2026 |
| Recent economics work · 20% | 10.0 | On 18 September 2026, BA Labs, acting as Sky Core Council Risk Advisor, recommended cBEAM rate parameters for the Osero deployment on the Sky Forum. | forum.sky.money ↗ | 22 September 2026 |
| Conflict-of-interest disclosure · 15% | 0.0 | No conflict of interest policy or token compensation disclosure found on its site or Substack. | blockanalitica.com ↗ | 22 September 2026 |
| Named team · 10% | 5.0 | Site names no team; founder and CEO Primoz Kordez is identifiable through LinkedIn and his public X account. | si.linkedin.com ↗ | 22 September 2026 |
| Transparent terms · 10% | 5.0 | Service lines are described (dashboards, risk monitoring and advisory, modelling and simulations) with no timelines or prices. | blockanalitica.com ↗ | 22 September 2026 |
What we liked
- Long, publicly visible record of parameter recommendations on the Sky governance forum
- Several engagements confirmed by clients, including HyperLend docs and a Compound governance payment
- Active open-source tooling on GitHub
Where it falls short
- Focus is collateral risk for lending, not token design or incentive modelling
- No conflict of interest policy published, although it also acts as a Morpho vault curator
- Website names no team; the founder is identifiable only through third-party profiles
| # | Service | Best for | Cost | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gauntlet | Lending and DEX protocols needing parameter and incentive optimization | Not published as a price list; the Compound contract was $2.3M per year in DAO proposals | 8.6 |
| 2 | LlamaRisk | Large lending protocols and stablecoin issuers that need a risk framework, parameter design and oracle-based risk automation | Not published as a price list; Aave renewal priced at $3.5M for one year (GHO plus 5,000 AAVE) | 7.6 |
| 3 | Tokenomics.net | Early-stage founders who want a fixed-price, fully documented token model before a raise | Data Room tiers $15,000, $20,000 and $25,000 | 7.1 |
| 4 | CryptoEconLab | Infrastructure, DePIN and AI protocols that need quantitative mechanism design and simulation | Design from $50,000 to $150,000+ | 6.9 |
| 5 | FinDaS | Early-stage teams that want a fixed-price token design or audit with an optional simulation model | Design $24,000 cash, or cash plus 0.5–1% of supply | 6.3 |
| 6 | BlockScience | Protocols that want simulation-based, research-grade mechanism and governance analysis | Not published | 6.0 |
| 7 | 8Blocks | Pre-TGE teams and Web2 or RWA businesses that want a token model or audit tied to business revenue | Workshop $2,500; Clutch lists $5,000+ minimum and $200-300/hr | 5.7 |
| 8 | Simplicity Group | Early-stage projects with modest budgets that want token design and GTM support from one vendor | Tokenomics from $5,000 | 5.6 |
| 9 | Chainrisk | Lending and perpetuals protocols that need a simulation-based economic audit of collateral, liquidation and interest rate parameters | Not published on the website; Compound forum proposals quoted a 90,000 USDC three-month pilot and a 500,000 USD annual retainer | 5.4 |
| 10 | Three Sigma | DeFi protocols that want a code audit and an economic or parameter review from the same vendor | Not published | 5.3 |
| 11 | Nethermind | Protocols wanting tokenomics analysis from a large engineering and security firm | Not published | 5.2 |
| 12 | Block Analitica | Lending and stablecoin protocols that need ongoing collateral risk parameters and monitoring rather than a one-off token design | Not published | 5.2 |
| 13 | Forgd | VC-backed projects preparing a TGE that want tokenomics, market maker and listing work from one provider | Cash and tokens; no cash price published | 4.0 |
| 14 | Delphi Consulting | Larger projects that want token advisory backed by a large research desk and are comfortable with a group that also invests | Not published | 3.8 |
| 15 | Blockphrase | Projects in India or the UAE that want token design combined with development and compliance work from one vendor | Not published | 2.4 |