Topics
Latest
Exchanges & trading
Custody & wallets
Yield & lending
DeFi & infrastructure
NFT & consumer
Business services
On-chain derivatives venues ranked on risk engine, depth and funding costs. Every score below is the weighted mean of the rubric marks, not an editor's gut feel.
HyperliquidBest for: Order-book perps with centralised-venue depth8.5/10
dYdXBest for: Long-standing order-book perps with a clean record8.4/10
Jupiter PerpsBest for: Simple leveraged exposure on Solana majors7.6/10
Drift ProtocolBest for: Order-book perps on Solana with cross-margin7.5/10
Vertex ProtocolBest for: Low-fee cross-margin trading on Arbitrum7.4/10
AevoBest for: Options and perps in one margin account7.3/10| # | Service | Score | Best for | Fees | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | HyperliquidStrong | 8.5/10 | Order-book perps with centralised-venue depth | ||
| 2 | dYdXStrong | 8.4/10 | Long-standing order-book perps with a clean record | ||
| 3 | Jupiter PerpsSolid | 7.6/10 | Simple leveraged exposure on Solana majors | ||
| 4 | Drift ProtocolSolid | 7.5/10 | Order-book perps on Solana with cross-margin | ||
| 5 | Vertex ProtocolSolid | 7.4/10 | Low-fee cross-margin trading on Arbitrum | ||
| 6 | AevoSolid | 7.3/10 | Options and perps in one margin account | ||
| 7 |  ParadexSolid | 7.2/10 | Cross-margin perps on a dedicated zk rollup | ||
| 8 |  GMXSolid | 7.1/10 | Zero-slippage swaps against a pooled counterparty | ||
| 9 |  Gains NetworkSolid | 7.0/10 | High leverage on forex and crypto synthetics | ||
| 10 |  Orderly NetworkSolid | 7.0/10 | Shared liquidity across many front ends | ||
| 11 |  ApeX ProtocolMixed | 6.8/10 | Order-book perps with an elastic automated market maker | ||
| 12 |  KwentaMixed | 6.7/10 | Synthetix-backed synthetic perps on Optimism | ||
| 13 |  Perpetual ProtocolMixed | 6.7/10 | Long-running Optimism perps with a public track record | ||
| 14 |  MUX ProtocolMixed | 6.5/10 | Aggregated leverage routing across venues | ||
| 15 |  SynFuturesMixed | 6.5/10 | Permissionless listing of long-tail perp markets |
The first on-chain venue that trades like a real exchange — and the one that had to socialise a nine-figure squeeze in public.
The oldest serious perps protocol, now on its own chain, with no exploit in eight years of operation.
Solana's most-used perps product: three markets, deep pooled liquidity, and borrow costs that add up fast.
A hybrid book-and-AMM design with proper cross-margin, rebuilt from scratch after its 2022 shutdown.
Among the cheapest venues to trade, with a hybrid order book that works better than its market share suggests.
The most credible on-chain options venue, running an off-chain book that it is refreshingly upfront about.
Paradigm's spin-out built its own Starknet appchain and priced itself for professionals; the depth is still arriving.
The pool-as-counterparty model that defined a generation of perp DEXs, now carrying both a design flaw and an exploit on its record.
Synthetic leverage on assets nobody else offers on-chain, backed by a single vault that carries all the risk.
Not a venue so much as an order book other venues rent — clever infrastructure, diffuse accountability.
A competent second-tier venue with StarkEx settlement and no incidents, competing in a market where depth decides everything.
A front end onto Synthetix's debt pool: no slippage by construction, and all the systemic risk of the pool behind it.
One of the original on-chain perps protocols, still running, still transparent, and largely passed by.
A leverage aggregator that routes to whichever venue is cheapest — useful, and one more layer between you and your collateral.
Anyone can list a perp market here, which is both the entire point and the entire risk.
Score = Σ (mark × weight), rounded to 0.1. A criterion with nothing published scores 0.
A perpetuals venue is a risk engine first and an exchange second. When markets gap, what matters is whether the oracle keeps up, whether the insurance fund absorbs bad debt, and whether the protocol claws back from profitable traders when it does not. That is why the risk engine carries the most weight here.
Funding is scored as a cost, not a feature. A venue with cheap taker fees and structurally expensive funding is not cheap for anyone holding longer than a session, so we mark the all-in cost of a multi-day position alongside the headline rate.
Most perp DEXs run at least one centralised component: a sequencer, an off-chain order book, a permissioned oracle set, an upgrade multisig. We do not penalise that by itself — we penalise pretending otherwise. Venues that publish their trust assumptions plainly score higher than those that hide them behind the word trustless.
Open interest and volume on a perp DEX can be inflated by wash trading and points farming, and incentive programmes distort both. Where a venue's activity is visibly incentive-driven, we discount it and say so in the review.
