Topics
Latest
Exchanges & trading
Custody & wallets
Yield & lending
DeFi & infrastructure
NFT & consumer
Business services
Centralised venues ranked on custody, liquidity, cost and regulatory standing. Every score below is the weighted mean of the rubric marks, not an editor's gut feel.
CoinbaseBest for: US users who want a regulated, publicly listed counterparty8.4/10
KrakenBest for: Security-first traders who still want real liquidity8.4/10
OKXBest for: Traders who want deep derivatives alongside spot8.1/10
BinanceBest for: Deepest books and the widest listing shelf8.0/10
UpbitBest for: Korean won liquidity7.7/10
BitstampBest for: European users who value a long, quiet record7.5/10| # | Service | Score | Best for | Fees | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | CoinbaseStrong | 8.4/10 | US users who want a regulated, publicly listed counterparty | ||
| 2 | KrakenStrong | 8.4/10 | Security-first traders who still want real liquidity | ||
| 3 | OKXStrong | 8.1/10 | Traders who want deep derivatives alongside spot | ||
| 4 | BinanceStrong | 8.0/10 | Deepest books and the widest listing shelf | ||
| 5 | UpbitSolid | 7.7/10 | Korean won liquidity | ||
| 6 | BitstampSolid | 7.5/10 | European users who value a long, quiet record | ||
| 7 |  Crypto.comSolid | 7.5/10 | App-first users who want card and exchange in one place | ||
| 8 |  BitgetSolid | 7.3/10 | Copy trading and derivatives on a budget | ||
| 9 |  BybitSolid | 7.3/10 | Derivatives traders who want fast execution | ||
| 10 |  GeminiSolid | 7.2/10 | US users prioritising regulatory clarity | ||
| 11 |  KuCoinSolid | 7.1/10 | Long-tail altcoin access | ||
| 12 |  Gate.ioSolid | 7.0/10 | Early listings and niche trading pairs | ||
| 13 |  BitfinexMixed | 6.9/10 | Margin traders and deep stablecoin markets | ||
| 14 |  MEXCMixed | 6.8/10 | Cheap access to newly listed tokens | ||
| 15 |  HTXMixed | 6.4/10 | Asian market access and derivatives depth |
The most transparent large exchange in the market, and one of the most expensive if you use the default buy button.
Fourteen years without an exchange-level breach, and it still trades like a serious venue rather than a museum piece.
A genuine all-rounder: deep spot and derivatives books, a capable Web3 wallet, and a compliance record that still needs watching.
The deepest order books in the market, wrapped in the messiest regulatory history of any venue we rate.
The dominant Korean venue: exceptional won-pair depth and cheap trading, effectively closed to everyone outside the country.
Europe's oldest surviving exchange: modest liquidity, unremarkable fees, and a licensing record that most rivals cannot match.
A well-licensed consumer platform whose app pricing quietly undoes the competitiveness of its exchange.
Strong derivatives liquidity and the most developed copy-trading product among the large venues, with a light regulatory footprint.
A fast, trader-friendly venue that absorbed the largest exchange theft on record without gating withdrawals — and still has to live with the fact it happened.
A New York trust company with strong custody engineering, still carrying the reputational bill for its Earn programme.
The widest small-cap shelf of any large venue, carried by a security and compliance record that has cost it dearly.
An enormous catalogue and an early proof-of-reserves programme, wrapped in an interface that assumes you already know what you are doing.
A professional trading venue with excellent margin infrastructure, permanently shadowed by 2016 and its Tether entanglement.
The cheapest large venue and one of the fastest to list, with the account-freeze complaints that usually accompany both.
Real liquidity and a long history, undermined by repeated security incidents and an opaque corporate structure.
Score = Σ (mark × weight), rounded to 0.1. A criterion with nothing published scores 0.
A centralised exchange is a custodian wearing a trading interface. Most users never move their coins off it, so the venue's internal custody practice becomes, in effect, their custody practice. That is why security carries the heaviest weight in this rubric, ahead of fees, and why a clean seven-year record beats a slick app that got drained and quietly rewrote its risk disclosures afterwards.
Regulatory standing sits second, not because paperwork makes an exchange safe, but because licences determine whether you can get your money out when a jurisdiction turns hostile. We mark down venues that serve users through geo-fence workarounds while telling regulators the opposite.
Every mark here is desk research: public filings, enforcement documents, proof-of-reserves pages, fee schedules, exchange status pages and incident post-mortems. We do not audit anyone's books, and a proof-of-reserves snapshot tells you what an exchange held on one day, not what it owed. Treat these scores as a starting point for your own checks, not a substitute for them.
Headline maker/taker rates are the smallest part of what most people pay. Convert-button spreads, wide stablecoin conversion rates and withdrawal fees usually cost more than the trading fee itself. Where a venue has a cheap professional interface and an expensive simple one, we score the cost you get by default, then note the cheaper path in the review.
