Topics
Latest
Exchanges & trading
Custody & wallets
Yield & lending
DeFi & infrastructure
NFT & consumer
Business services
LST issuers ranked on decentralisation, peg behaviour and withdrawal design. Every score below is the weighted mean of the rubric marks, not an editor's gut feel.
Rocket PoolBest for: Decentralised Ethereum staking with permissionless operators8.7/10
MarinadeBest for: Decentralisation-weighted Solana staking8.5/10
JitoBest for: Solana staking with MEV revenue included8.3/10
LidoBest for: Deepest liquidity and DeFi integration8.3/10
StakeWiseBest for: Choosing your own operator inside a liquid staking protocol8.2/10
Liquid CollectiveBest for: Institutions needing a compliance-screened LST7.3/10| # | Service | Score | Best for | Fees | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rocket PoolStrong | 8.7/10 | Decentralised Ethereum staking with permissionless operators | ||
| 2 | MarinadeStrong | 8.5/10 | Decentralisation-weighted Solana staking | ||
| 3 | JitoStrong | 8.3/10 | Solana staking with MEV revenue included | ||
| 4 | LidoStrong | 8.3/10 | Deepest liquidity and DeFi integration | ||
| 5 | StakeWiseStrong | 8.2/10 | Choosing your own operator inside a liquid staking protocol | ||
| 6 | Liquid CollectiveSolid | 7.3/10 | Institutions needing a compliance-screened LST | ||
| 7 |  Mantle mETHSolid | 7.2/10 | ETH staking with Mantle ecosystem incentives | ||
| 8 |  StaderSolid | 7.2/10 | Multi-chain liquid staking from one protocol | ||
| 9 |  SwellSolid | 7.2/10 | ETH staking with restaking exposure attached | ||
| 10 |  BENQI Liquid StakingSolid | 7.1/10 | Avalanche liquid staking | ||
| 11 |  BifrostSolid | 7.0/10 | Liquid staking in the Polkadot ecosystem | ||
| 12 |  Frax EtherMixed | 6.9/10 | Yield-optimised ETH staking inside the Frax ecosystem | ||
| 13 |  Coinbase cbETHMixed | 6.4/10 | Institutions that need a regulated counterparty | ||
| 14 |  Binance WBETHMixed | 6.3/10 | Binance users wanting a tradable staked-ETH position | ||
| 15 |  Ankr StakingMixed | 6.2/10 | Liquid staking across a long list of smaller chains |
The only major LST where anyone can become an operator, and the one that treats decentralisation as a constraint rather than a slogan.
The Solana LST that actively spreads stake toward smaller validators, at some cost to its own market share.
Solana's dominant LST, paying out MEV revenue that ordinary staking leaves on the table, at a genuinely low fee.
The most liquid, most integrated LST in existence, and the one whose size is a standing argument about Ethereum's decentralisation.
Vault-based staking that lets you pick the operator and the fee — the most flexible architecture in the category, with the least liquidity.
Liquid staking built to institutional standards, including the compliance screening that makes it unusable for anyone who wanted permissionless.
A well-audited LST underwritten by a very large treasury, and effectively an extension of one ecosystem's balance sheet.
Liquid staking across many chains with a permissionless operator pool on Ethereum, spread thinner than the single-chain specialists.
A capable mid-sized LST that has bet its future on restaking, which adds yield and a second layer of risk.
The dominant Avalanche LST, deeply integrated into the chain's DeFi and limited by the same chain's activity.
The main liquid staking option for Polkadot and Kusama, operating in an ecosystem whose liquidity has shrunk around it.
Competitive yields engineered through the Frax ecosystem, with a validator set and governance that are anything but open.
A regulated, audited wrapper around Coinbase's own validators, charging a quarter of your rewards for the privilege.
Large, liquid and entirely dependent on one exchange — a custodial staking product wearing an LST's clothes.
Broad multi-chain coverage from a firm whose 2022 key compromise let an attacker mint a trillion tokens.
Score = Σ (mark × weight), rounded to 0.1. A criterion with nothing published scores 0.
A liquid staking token is a claim on staked collateral, wrapped in a smart contract, secured by validators you did not choose. Each of those layers can fail independently, so decentralisation of the operator set carries the most weight here — a protocol that routes a large share of a network's stake through a permissioned operator list is a risk to the chain and a correlated risk to its own holders.
Peg behaviour is scored on history, not theory. Every LST trades at a discount when exit queues lengthen and leverage unwinds; the question is how deep the discount went, how long it lasted, and whether redemption remained available throughout.
Before Ethereum enabled withdrawals, LSTs were an exercise in trust. Now the question is mechanical: can you redeem directly from the protocol without permission, how long is the queue, and does the contract prioritise anyone ahead of you. Protocols where exit depends on secondary-market liquidity rather than redemption score materially lower.
A ten per cent protocol fee on staking rewards sounds small against a headline yield. Over a multi-year holding period, layered on top of an operator commission, it is the difference between matching the network rate and trailing it. We score the total leakage, not the headline number.
