6.4
Mixed
Best Crypto Exchanges · Review

HTX

Real liquidity and a long history, undermined by repeated security incidents and an opaque corporate structure.

Best For
Asian market access and derivatives depth
Headline Cost
~0.20% spot before discounts
Founded
2013
Rank in category
15 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

HTX, formerly Huobi, still carries real liquidity and a catalogue that reaches deep into the long tail, and it has the weakest security and disclosure record of any large venue we rate. It scores 6.4/10 and we would not hold funds there beyond an active trade.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Security & custody · 25%
5.5
Regulatory standing · 20%
4.5
Liquidity & depth · 20%
7.5
Cost · 15%
7.5
Asset range · 10%
8.5
Support & UX · 10%
6.5

Usable, but there are better options for most people. The headline 6.4 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Operating since 2013 with genuine derivatives depth
  • Wide asset coverage and frequent new listings
  • Reimbursed users after its 2023 hot-wallet losses

Where it falls short

  • Multiple hot-wallet compromises across 2023
  • Ownership and entity structure are hard to pin down

HTX has been operating since 2013 under one name or another and remains a genuinely liquid venue, particularly during Asian trading hours. It is also the exchange in this list with the most recent pattern of security incidents, the least transparent ownership, and the weakest regulatory footing — a combination that keeps its score below every other large venue we rate.

What HTX actually is

A spot and derivatives exchange with broad asset coverage, an earn desk and a launchpad, rebranded from Huobi in 2023 after a change of control. Its advisory relationship with Justin Sun and the deep entanglement between HTX, Tron and the broader ecosystem around them is the single most important structural fact about the venue: assets, liquidity and governance across those entities are not independent of one another in the way separate businesses normally are.

Security: the record

In September and November 2023 HTX suffered hot-wallet compromises totalling tens of millions of dollars, with a further incident affecting the associated HECO bridge. The exchange covered the losses and continued operating, but the post-mortems were thin and the pattern — multiple compromises within months — points to systemic key-management weakness rather than isolated bad luck. Our security mark of 5.5 is the lowest in the category and reflects that pattern rather than any single event.

Fees and execution

Spot fees run around 0.20% before discounts, above the market norm, falling with volume and token holdings. Derivatives pricing is competitive. Order-book depth on majors is real, and the long tail behaves as it does everywhere: thin, wide, and unsuited to size.

Disclosure and regulation

Ownership and control are difficult to establish from public sources, the operating entity has changed jurisdiction more than once, and formal licensing is minimal. Proof-of-reserves attestations are published but with less consistency than OKX's or Bitget's. In a category where the disclosure baseline is already low, HTX sits below it.

Who should use HTX

Traders who need Asian-hours depth on a specific asset that is meaningfully more liquid here than elsewhere, for the duration of that trade. There is no case for using it as a custodian or a primary account. If the asset you want is available on OKX, Bybit or KuCoin at comparable depth, use one of those instead.

FAQ

Is HTX safe?
Less so than its peers. It suffered multiple hot-wallet compromises during 2023, covered the losses, and published limited detail about the causes. Ownership and licensing are also opaque.
Is HTX the same as Huobi?
Yes — Huobi rebranded to HTX in 2023 following a change of control. The operating history, and the incidents on it, carry over.
What are HTX's fees?
Around 0.20% on spot before discounts, which is above the market average, with reductions for volume and token holdings. Derivatives pricing is more competitive.
Should I use HTX or OKX?
OKX, in almost every case: comparable or better depth, cheaper fees, a monthly proof-of-reserves cadence and a materially better security record.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1CoinbaseUS users who want a regulated, publicly listed counterpartyLow on Advanced Trade; markedly higher on the simple buy screen8.4
2KrakenSecurity-first traders who still want real liquidity~0.16%/0.26% maker/taker on Pro, tiered by volume8.4
3OKXTraders who want deep derivatives alongside spot~0.08%/0.10% maker/taker spot, tiered8.1
4BinanceDeepest books and the widest listing shelf~0.10% spot maker/taker, lower with BNB and volume tiers8.0
5UpbitKorean won liquidity~0.05% on KRW pairs7.7
6BitstampEuropean users who value a long, quiet record~0.30% at low volume, falling sharply with tier7.5
7Crypto.comApp-first users who want card and exchange in one placeExchange fees competitive; app pricing carries a wider spread7.5
8BitgetCopy trading and derivatives on a budget~0.10% spot, discounts via BGB7.3
9BybitDerivatives traders who want fast execution~0.10%/0.10% spot, cheaper on derivatives tiers7.3
10GeminiUS users prioritising regulatory clarityActiveTrader tiers are competitive; the simple interface is not7.2
11KuCoinLong-tail altcoin access~0.10% spot, discounts with KCS7.1
12Gate.ioEarly listings and niche trading pairs~0.09–0.20% spot depending on tier and GT holdings7.0
13BitfinexMargin traders and deep stablecoin markets~0.10%/0.20% maker/taker, tiered6.9
14MEXCCheap access to newly listed tokens0% maker on many spot pairs; taker ~0.05%6.8
15HTXAsian market access and derivatives depth~0.20% spot before discounts6.4