7.5
Solid
Best Crypto Exchanges · Review

Bitstamp

Europe's oldest surviving exchange: modest liquidity, unremarkable fees, and a licensing record that most rivals cannot match.

Best For
European users who value a long, quiet record
Headline Cost
~0.30% at low volume, falling sharply with tier
Founded
2011
Rank in category
6 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Bitstamp is a conservative, well-licensed European exchange with fourteen years of operation and, since its acquisition by Robinhood, a regulated public parent behind it. It scores 7.4/10 — strong on regulation and security, weak on fees and asset range.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Security & custody · 25%
8.5
Regulatory standing · 20%
9.0
Liquidity & depth · 20%
6.5
Cost · 15%
6.0
Asset range · 10%
6.0
Support & UX · 10%
7.5

Works well for a specific use case, weaker outside it. The headline 7.5 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Operating since 2011 with strong European licensing
  • Now part of Robinhood, adding balance-sheet strength
  • Clean, conservative listing policy

Where it falls short

  • Retail fee tier is expensive compared with peers
  • Thin liquidity outside the majors and a short asset list

Bitstamp launched in 2011 and has outlasted almost every exchange of its generation, which in this sector counts as a credential in itself. Its acquisition by Robinhood, completed in 2025, added something rarer: a publicly listed, US-regulated parent with real capital, audited accounts and a reputational stake in the subsidiary behaving well.

What Bitstamp actually is

A spot exchange with a conservative listing policy, strong EUR and USD fiat rails, an institutional desk and staking on a limited set of assets. It holds a Luxembourg payment institution licence, has secured MiCA authorisation, and maintains registrations across several European markets and in the UK. The asset list runs to a few dozen rather than a few hundred, deliberately.

Fees: the main reason not to use it

The retail tier starts around 0.30% for low monthly volume, which is roughly double Kraken Pro and triple Binance at equivalent size. Fees fall sharply with volume, so an active trader reaches competitive rates, but for a typical retail user buying a few thousand a month, Bitstamp is one of the more expensive credible venues. There is no cheaper interface hiding behind the main one — the price you see is the price.

Security and history

Bitstamp suffered a hot-wallet theft of roughly 19,000 BTC in January 2015, absorbed the loss without customer impact, and has operated without a comparable incident in the decade since. It holds the large majority of assets in cold storage with insurance on the online portion, and undergoes regular external security examinations. That is a good record — one incident, eleven years ago, fully absorbed.

Liquidity and coverage

Depth is adequate on BTC and ETH against EUR and USD and thin beyond that. Traders needing size or altcoin access will find it limiting. What it does offer is reliability: the venue is not prone to outages during volatility, order execution is predictable, and fiat withdrawals arrive when they are supposed to.

Who should use Bitstamp

European users who value licensing and a long quiet record over cost, and who buy majors rather than trade the long tail. Anyone fee-sensitive should use Kraken instead — comparable regulatory standing, better liquidity, materially lower fees. Bitstamp's case is stability, and stability is worth something, just not 0.30%.

FAQ

Is Bitstamp safe?
Yes, on the evidence: one hot-wallet theft in 2015 absorbed without customer loss, none since, cold storage for the majority of assets, European licensing and now a publicly listed parent in Robinhood.
Why are Bitstamp's fees so high?
Its entry tier starts near 0.30%, aimed at low-volume retail users. Fees fall steeply with monthly volume, so the cost problem affects casual buyers far more than active traders.
What changed after Robinhood acquired Bitstamp?
Ownership and balance-sheet strength. The exchange continues to operate under its own brand and European licences, now backed by a listed US company with audited financials.
Bitstamp or Kraken?
Kraken, for most users: similar regulatory standing and security record, better liquidity and considerably lower fees. Bitstamp's advantage is a longer unbroken European operating history.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1CoinbaseUS users who want a regulated, publicly listed counterpartyLow on Advanced Trade; markedly higher on the simple buy screen8.4
2KrakenSecurity-first traders who still want real liquidity~0.16%/0.26% maker/taker on Pro, tiered by volume8.4
3OKXTraders who want deep derivatives alongside spot~0.08%/0.10% maker/taker spot, tiered8.1
4BinanceDeepest books and the widest listing shelf~0.10% spot maker/taker, lower with BNB and volume tiers8.0
5UpbitKorean won liquidity~0.05% on KRW pairs7.7
6BitstampEuropean users who value a long, quiet record~0.30% at low volume, falling sharply with tier7.5
7Crypto.comApp-first users who want card and exchange in one placeExchange fees competitive; app pricing carries a wider spread7.5
8BitgetCopy trading and derivatives on a budget~0.10% spot, discounts via BGB7.3
9BybitDerivatives traders who want fast execution~0.10%/0.10% spot, cheaper on derivatives tiers7.3
10GeminiUS users prioritising regulatory clarityActiveTrader tiers are competitive; the simple interface is not7.2
11KuCoinLong-tail altcoin access~0.10% spot, discounts with KCS7.1
12Gate.ioEarly listings and niche trading pairs~0.09–0.20% spot depending on tier and GT holdings7.0
13BitfinexMargin traders and deep stablecoin markets~0.10%/0.20% maker/taker, tiered6.9
14MEXCCheap access to newly listed tokens0% maker on many spot pairs; taker ~0.05%6.8
15HTXAsian market access and derivatives depth~0.20% spot before discounts6.4