6.5
Mixed
Best NFT Marketplaces · Review

LooksRare

The original vampire attack on OpenSea: enormous wash-traded volume, then a long decline into irrelevance.

Best For
Little that its competitors do not do better
Headline Cost
~0.5% marketplace fee
Founded
2022
Rank in category
15 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

LooksRare launched with token rewards for trading and generated billions in volume that was overwhelmingly wash trading — users selling NFTs to themselves to farm emissions. The platform still works at a very low fee, and there is essentially no market on it now.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Approval & custody safety · 25%
7.5
Fee clarity · 20%
8.0
Liquidity · 20%
4.0
Royalty policy · 15%
6.5
Chain coverage · 10%
4.5
Usability · 10%
7.5

Usable, but there are better options for most people. The headline 6.5 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Very low marketplace fee
  • Contracts have operated without a security incident
  • Still functional with reasonable tooling

Where it falls short

  • Launch volume was overwhelmingly wash trading for token rewards
  • Liquidity today is minimal

LooksRare is the clearest case study in incentive design gone wrong. It rewarded users with tokens proportional to trading volume, so users traded with themselves at enormous notional prices to maximise rewards. Reported volume exceeded OpenSea's within days and meant nothing.

Why it matters beyond LooksRare

This is why NFT volume statistics require scepticism generally. Wash trading is cheap when the marketplace fee is low and the rewards are high, and any platform running volume-based incentives will produce inflated numbers. CryptoSlam's wash-trade filtering exists specifically because of episodes like this one.

Where it stands

The platform still functions with a very low marketplace fee of around 0.5% and its contracts have not been exploited. Actual liquidity is minimal — the users left when the rewards did.

Royalties

Optional, following the wider market shift.

Who should use it

Few people. Its fee is low and its market is empty, so a listing here reaches almost nobody.

FAQ

Was LooksRare's volume real?
Overwhelmingly not. Token rewards proportional to trading volume made wash trading profitable, and users traded with themselves at inflated prices to farm emissions.
Is LooksRare still operating?
Yes, with a low fee and functioning contracts, but with minimal actual liquidity.
What is a vampire attack?
Launching a competing platform with token incentives designed to pull liquidity and users away from an incumbent — LooksRare's launch against OpenSea is the canonical NFT example.
What does LooksRare charge?
Around 0.5% marketplace fee, among the lowest available.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1Magic EdenMulti-chain NFT trading including Bitcoin and Solana~2% marketplace fee8.1
2OpenSeaThe broadest collection coverage across chainsMarketplace fee currently 0% on most trades8.1
3ManifoldCreators who want to own their contractNo platform fee; gas only7.8
4objkt.comTezos art collecting with royalties intact~2.5% marketplace fee7.7
5TensorSolana NFT trading with pro tooling~1.4% taker fee7.6
6Immutable MarketplaceGaming NFTs with gas-free trading~2% protocol fee7.4
7ZoraOpen-edition minting and creator-first distributionFlat mint fee; no marketplace fee7.4
8BlurProfessional traders and collection bidding0% marketplace fee; optional royalties7.3
9FoundationCurated single-edition digital art5% on primary sales7.3
10RaribleMulti-chain listing and white-label marketplaces~1% plus creator royalties7.3
11MintifyTrading terminal-style NFT execution~0.5% plus venue fees7.1
12SuperRareHigh-end curated crypto art15% on primary, 3% on secondary7.1
13OKX NFT MarketplaceAggregated trading inside an exchange accountAggregated; venue fees apply7.0
14Element MarketCheap aggregated buying across chains~0.5% plus aggregated venue fees6.7
15LooksRareLittle that its competitors do not do better~0.5% marketplace fee6.5