7.6
Solid
Best Hardware Wallets · Review

Ledger Nano X

The most capable device by coverage, from the vendor with the worst record on trust in the category.

Best For
Broadest asset and application support
Headline Cost
Around $150
Founded
2014
Rank in category
11 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Ledger's hardware is genuinely strong — a certified secure element with no demonstrated key extraction — and it supports more chains and applications than any competitor. Its firmware is closed, so those claims cannot be independently verified, and its handling of the 2020 customer data leak and the 2023 Recover announcement destroyed a great deal of user trust.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Key isolation · 25%
9.0
Firmware openness · 20%
5.0
Recovery design · 20%
7.0
Asset coverage · 15%
10.0
Vendor conduct · 10%
5.5
Usability · 10%
9.0

Works well for a specific use case, weaker outside it. The headline 7.6 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Supports more chains and applications than any competitor
  • Certified secure element with a strong physical security record
  • Polished software and the widest third-party integration

Where it falls short

  • Closed-source firmware, so the security claims cannot be independently verified
  • 2020 e-commerce breach exposed customer addresses; the 2023 Recover launch was badly mishandled

Ledger is the best-selling hardware wallet in the world and the most controversial. On capability it wins outright: several thousand assets, deep application support through Ledger Live, integration with essentially every software wallet, and a secure element with a strong physical security record.

The 2020 breach

An e-commerce database leak exposed the names, addresses and phone numbers of around 270,000 customers. The consequence was not stolen crypto but years of targeted phishing, extortion attempts and, in some reported cases, physical threats against people known to own hardware wallets. It remains the most damaging privacy failure in this industry.

Ledger Recover and what it revealed

In 2023 Ledger announced an optional service that shards an encrypted seed backup across custodians. The technical detail that alarmed users was that firmware could, with consent, export key material at all — contradicting years of messaging that the seed could never leave the secure element. The service is opt-in and requires identity verification, and the episode showed the limits of trusting a closed-firmware vendor's marketing over its architecture.

Assessing it fairly

No Ledger device has had its secure element defeated in the wild, and no user has lost funds to a firmware backdoor. If your threat model is physical attack and remote compromise, the hardware performs. If your threat model includes trusting the vendor's unverifiable claims, it does not.

Who should use it

Users who need coverage of chains no open-source device supports, and who accept closed firmware. Anyone who can meet their needs with a BitBox02, Trezor Safe or Keystone should — the security is comparable and the verifiability is better.

FAQ

Is Ledger safe to use after the Recover controversy?
The devices have never been compromised in the wild and Recover is opt-in. The issue is architectural trust: closed firmware capable of exporting key material under some conditions cannot be independently verified.
What happened in the Ledger data breach?
In 2020 an e-commerce database leak exposed roughly 270,000 customers' names, addresses and phone numbers, leading to years of targeted phishing and extortion attempts against known hardware wallet owners.
Does Ledger support more coins than competitors?
Yes, by a wide margin — several thousand assets and the deepest application integration of any hardware wallet.
Should I buy a Ledger?
Only if you need chains that open-source devices do not support. Otherwise BitBox02, Trezor Safe or Keystone offer comparable security with verifiable firmware.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1BitBox02The best balance of open firmware and usabilityAround $1508.9
2Trezor Safe 5Open-source purists who want a modern screenAround $1708.8
3Keystone 3 ProAir-gapped multi-chain signingAround $1308.7
4Trezor Safe 3Cheapest route to open firmware plus a secure elementAround $808.7
5OneKey ProOpen-source multi-chain with modern hardwareAround $2508.5
6Coldcard Mk4Bitcoin-only cold storage taken seriouslyAround $1608.3
7Foundation PassportAir-gapped Bitcoin with hardware you can inspectAround $1998.2
8GridPlus Lattice1DeFi users who want to read what they are signingAround $4008.0
9NGRAVE ZEROMaximum air-gap for long-term storageAround $4008.0
10Blockstream JadeAffordable open-source Bitcoin signingAround $657.9
11Ledger Nano XBroadest asset and application supportAround $1507.6
12SeedSignerStateless, self-built Bitcoin signingAround $50 in parts7.6
13Tangem WalletSimplest possible cold storage for beginnersAround $55 for a card set7.6
14SafePal S1Cheap air-gapped multi-chain storageAround $507.1
15Ellipal Titan 2.0Physically rugged air-gapped storageAround $1707.0