8.0
Strong
Best Yield Aggregators · Review

Yearn Finance

The original yield aggregator, still the most transparent about what its vaults hold and what could go wrong with them.

Best For
Battle-tested vaults with genuine strategy transparency
Headline Cost
Typically 2% management, 10–20% performance
Founded
2020
Rank in category
7 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Yearn invented this category and remains its most serious practitioner: strategies are published with named risk factors, the codebase is heavily examined, and v3 vaults allow multi-strategy allocation with clear accounting. It charges more than its competitors and has been exploited twice for modest amounts.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Strategy disclosure · 25%
9.0
Contract security · 25%
8.0
Net yield · 20%
7.5
Risk controls · 15%
8.5
Fees · 15%
6.5

Recommendable to most readers, with stated caveats. The headline 8.0 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Strategies are published in detail with named risk factors
  • Five years of production experience and a large public codebase
  • v3 vaults allow multi-strategy allocation with clear accounting

Where it falls short

  • Suffered a $11m vault exploit in 2021 and a smaller yETH incident in 2023
  • Fee structure is heavier than most competitors

A yield aggregator is a manager. It takes your deposit, allocates it to strategies you did not choose, and charges for the service. The only meaningful question is whether you can find out what it is doing, and Yearn answers that better than anyone in DeFi.

Strategy transparency

Each vault publishes its strategies, the protocols they touch, the risk factors involved and a risk score with the reasoning behind it. That means a depositor can determine, before depositing, that a vault is farming a specific lending market and is therefore exposed to that market's collateral policy. Most competitors describe strategy in a sentence of marketing.

Fees

Typically 2% management and 10–20% performance, which is the heaviest in the category — Beefy charges around 4.5% of harvests and Convex around 17% of rewards with no management fee. Yearn's argument is that active strategy management and security review cost money. Whether that premium is worth paying depends on whether the strategies actually outperform, which varies by vault.

Security record

A v1 DAI vault was exploited in 2021 for around $11m through a manipulated Curve pool, and a smaller yETH pool bug occurred in 2023. Both were disclosed thoroughly and partially recovered. Five years of production across many vaults with two incidents of that size is a reasonable record for a protocol composing this many external dependencies.

Who should use it

Depositors who want to know exactly what their capital is doing and will read the strategy documentation. Cost-sensitive users farming simple positions should use Beefy or hold the underlying position directly.

FAQ

What does Yearn charge?
Typically 2% management and 10–20% performance, which is the heaviest fee structure among major yield aggregators.
Has Yearn been hacked?
Twice: a v1 DAI vault for around $11m in 2021 via a manipulated Curve pool, and a smaller yETH pool bug in 2023. Both were disclosed in detail and partially recovered.
How do I know what a Yearn vault is doing?
Each vault publishes its strategies, the protocols involved and a risk score with reasoning — the most detailed disclosure in the category.
Is Yearn worth the fee?
It depends on the vault. For complex multi-strategy positions the management has value; for simple auto-compounding, cheaper alternatives do the same job.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1PendleFixing a yield rate or trading it separately~3% of yield plus swap fees8.6
2Convex FinanceBoosted Curve yields without locking CRV~17% of rewards8.5
3Morpho VaultsCurated lending exposure with named risk managersPerformance fee set by each curator8.4
4Kamino FinanceAutomated liquidity management on SolanaPerformance fee varies by vault8.1
5Beefy FinanceAuto-compounding across many chains~4.5% of harvested yield8.0
6Enzyme FinanceOn-chain asset management with enforced mandatesSet by each vault manager8.0
7Yearn FinanceBattle-tested vaults with genuine strategy transparencyTypically 2% management, 10–20% performance8.0
8Aura FinanceBoosted Balancer yields~19–25% of rewards7.8
9Idle FinanceTranched risk exposure to lending yields~10–15% performance fee7.6
10Gearbox ProtocolLeveraged farming with contained liquidation riskInterest on borrowed leverage7.5
11Origin ProtocolRebasing yield-bearing stablecoin and ETH tokens~10–20% performance fee7.4
12AutofarmCheap compounding on BNB Chain and smaller networks~3% of harvests6.8
13SommelierOff-chain strategy computation with on-chain execution~1–2% management plus 10% performance6.8
14Vesper FinanceSimple set-and-forget pools~2% management, 15% performance6.5
15Harvest FinanceLong-running auto-compounding on EVM chains~30% performance fee5.9