8.5
Strong
Best Staking Providers · Review

Kiln

The staking engine behind a lot of products that do not mention it, with SOC 2 controls and a clean record.

Best For
Staking infrastructure embedded in other products
Headline Cost
Typically ~7–10% of rewards
Founded
2018
Rank in category
4 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Kiln provides the staking infrastructure behind many products that never mention it, audited to SOC 2 Type II with strong validator performance and non-custodial options. That intermediated model means your service relationship is with the front end, not with Kiln.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Performance & uptime · 25%
9.0
Slashing & incident record · 20%
9.0
Fees · 20%
8.0
Decentralisation contribution · 15%
8.0
Transparency · 10%
8.5
Accessibility · 10%
8.0

Recommendable to most readers, with stated caveats. The headline 8.5 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • White-label infrastructure used by exchanges, wallets and custodians
  • SOC 2 Type II certified operations
  • Strong validator performance with non-custodial options

Where it falls short

  • End users often do not know they are using it
  • Public performance detail is thinner than the research-led operators

When a wallet, exchange or custodian offers staking without operating validators itself, someone else is running the infrastructure. Frequently that someone is Kiln, which has built a white-label staking business audited to standards most crypto firms never attempt.

What SOC 2 Type II actually means

It is an examination of operational controls — access management, change control, monitoring — over a period rather than at a point in time. For staking, where the failure mode is an operational lapse causing downtime or slashing rather than a clever exploit, that kind of controls assurance is more relevant than a smart contract audit.

Performance and custody model

Validator performance across supported networks is consistently above average, and both custodial and non-custodial integration paths are offered. For Ethereum, the non-custodial path keeps withdrawal credentials with the client, which is the configuration any serious deployment should require.

The intermediation caveat

If you stake through a wallet powered by Kiln, your contract is with the wallet. Service levels, commission and dispute resolution are set by that intermediary, and the commission you pay may include the front end's markup on top of Kiln's fee. Ask which provider runs the validators and what the total take is.

Who should use Kiln

Platforms integrating staking, and institutions wanting audited infrastructure with a direct relationship. Individuals will usually encounter it indirectly and should check what their front end is charging on top.

FAQ

What is Kiln?
A staking infrastructure provider that operates validators on behalf of wallets, exchanges, custodians and institutions, usually white-labelled inside their products.
Am I already using Kiln?
Possibly. Several major wallets and platforms route their staking through it without prominent branding. Check your provider's documentation for the underlying operator.
Is Kiln audited?
It holds SOC 2 Type II certification, which examines operational controls over a period — the relevant assurance for infrastructure where operational failure is the main risk.
Does Kiln hold my assets?
Non-custodial integrations are available and preferred, keeping withdrawal credentials with the client while Kiln operates the validators.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1Chorus OneResearch-led validation across many chainsTypically ~8% of rewards8.6
2AllnodesRunning your own validator without running serversFlat monthly node fees or ~5–8% commission8.5
3FigmentInstitutional staking with reporting to matchTypically 8–10% of rewards for institutions8.5
4KilnStaking infrastructure embedded in other productsTypically ~7–10% of rewards8.5
5stakefishRetail Ethereum staking without a minimum~10% of rewards8.5
6Staking FacilitiesEuropean institutional delegation with strong governance participationTypically ~8%8.4
7EverstakeLow-commission delegation across many chains~5–10% depending on network8.2
8P2P.orgBroad network coverage with solid performanceTypically ~8% of rewards8.2
9LuganodesInstitutional staking with a clean short recordInstitutional pricing, typically ~8%8.1
10BlockdaemonEnterprise-grade node and staking infrastructureInstitutional pricing, typically 8–12%7.9
11RockXAsia-based institutional stakingTypically ~8–10%7.9
12InfStonesBroad node infrastructure with developer APIsVaries by network, typically 8–10%7.7
13TwinstakeRegulated institutions needing non-custodial stakingInstitutional pricing on request7.6
14Kraken StakingSimple staking for European and international usersRoughly 15–20% of rewards7.5
15Coinbase StakingConvenience for existing Coinbase customersUp to 25–35% of rewards for retail7.1