6.9
Mixed
Best Liquid Restaking Protocols · Review

Jito Restaking

A restaking framework from the team that already runs Solana's biggest LST — credible operators, unproven mechanism.

Best For
Restaking infrastructure from Solana's largest staking operator
Headline Cost
Set per vault
Founded
2024
Rank in category
7 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Jito's restaking framework benefits from the operational credibility of the team behind Solana's dominant liquid staking token, with modular vault and operator design and public documentation. As with any framework, its discipline does not extend to what people build on it, and slashing enforcement is still largely untested.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Added slashing risk · 25%
6.5
Contract security · 20%
7.0
Exit liquidity · 20%
6.0
Operator transparency · 20%
7.5
Fees · 15%
8.0

Usable, but there are better options for most people. The headline 6.9 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Built by the most established staking team on Solana
  • Modular vault and operator design with public documentation
  • Open framework rather than a single closed product

Where it falls short

  • Vaults built on it vary widely in quality and disclosure
  • Slashing enforcement remains largely theoretical

Jito already operates Solana's largest liquid staking token and the block engine behind much of the chain's MEV. Its restaking framework extends that infrastructure position into shared security, providing the vault and operator primitives that other teams build products on.

Framework, not product

This is a base layer rather than a consumer product: node consensus networks define what they need secured, vaults hold collateral, operators run the infrastructure. Users generally interact with something built on it rather than with the framework directly, which means the risk assessment is about the specific vault, not about Jito.

Credibility and its limits

The team's track record operating validators and MEV infrastructure at scale is a genuine input — restaking is fundamentally an operations problem, and Jito has demonstrated competence there. What that credibility does not cover is whether the economics work: services must pay for security, and on both Solana and Ethereum, they are not yet paying much.

Slashing

Enforcement mechanics exist in the framework and have not been exercised at scale. Until they are, the yield is being earned against a risk that has not yet manifested, which is the least informative state for judging a system.

Who should use it

Builders wanting Solana restaking primitives from a credible operator, and users of specific products built on it who have evaluated that product rather than the framework.

FAQ

Is Jito Restaking a product I can deposit into?
It is a framework. Users typically interact with vaults and products built on it, so the relevant risk assessment is of that specific product.
Does Jito's staking record apply to its restaking?
Partly. Operational competence transfers; the economics of restaking and the untested slashing mechanics are separate questions.
Has slashing been enforced?
Not at scale. Enforcement mechanics exist in the framework but have not been meaningfully exercised, so the risk remains largely theoretical.
What are the fees?
Set per vault by whoever operates it, rather than at the framework level.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1ether.fiThe most liquid LRT with the best-documented stack~10% of rewards7.9
2EigenLayerThe base restaking layer everything else builds onNo protocol fee at the base layer7.6
3Puffer FinanceAnti-slashing technology and lower operator bonds~5% of rewards7.6
4SymbioticRestaking collateral beyond ETHNo protocol fee at the base layer7.3
5Kelp DAORestaking multiple LSTs from one position~10% of rewards7.2
6Swell rswETHRestaking from an established liquid staking operator~10% of rewards7.1
7Jito RestakingRestaking infrastructure from Solana's largest staking operatorSet per vault6.9
8Mellow FinanceChoosing a curated restaking risk profileSet per vault curator6.8
9RenzoMulti-chain restaking exposure~10% of rewards6.6
10SolayerRestaking on Solana~5–10% of rewards6.5
11EigenpieIsolated per-LST restaking positions~10% of rewards6.4
12BedrockMulti-asset restaking including BTC-denominated products~10% of rewards6.3
13FragmetricNormalised restaking positions on Solana~5–10% of rewards6.1
14InceptionIsolated restaking vaults across several assets~10% of rewards6.1
15KarakRestaking a wide range of assets across chainsVaries by deployment6.0