7.2
Solid
Best Decentralised Exchanges · Review

Raydium

Where most Solana tokens first find a market, with a 2022 front-end incident and heavy memecoin exposure on its record.

Best For
New Solana token liquidity
Headline Cost
~0.25% standard pools, lower on concentrated
Founded
2021
Rank in category
11 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Raydium is where most new Solana tokens first find liquidity, which makes it essential for early access and exposes users to the least vetted end of the market. It scores 7.5/10, with a security mark of 7 reflecting the December 2022 compromise of pool authority keys.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Security record · 25%
7.0
Liquidity & execution · 20%
8.5
Cost · 15%
8.0
Chain coverage · 15%
5.5
Decentralisation · 15%
6.5
UX & tooling · 10%
7.5

Works well for a specific use case, weaker outside it. The headline 7.2 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Deepest venue for freshly launched Solana assets
  • Concentrated liquidity pools alongside classic AMM pools
  • Survived the FTX collapse that gutted its original order-book model

Where it falls short

  • December 2022 exploit of pool authority keys cost roughly $4.4m
  • Volume is dominated by short-lived speculative tokens

Raydium's role on Solana is specific: it is the venue where new tokens establish a market, and where a large share of the chain's speculative volume happens. That makes it genuinely useful for anyone who wants early access, and it means the venue's headline statistics are dominated by assets that will not exist in six months.

How Raydium works

Raydium runs standard AMM pools and concentrated liquidity pools, with a permissionless pool creation flow that lets any project launch a market immediately. Standard pool fees are around 0.25%, with lower tiers on concentrated pools. Its original design routed liquidity into the Serum order book; after FTX's collapse took Serum with it, Raydium rebuilt around its own liquidity and the OpenBook fork.

The 2022 exploit

In December 2022 an attacker gained control of the pool owner authority — reportedly through a compromised deployer key rather than a contract bug — and withdrew roughly $4.4m from several pools. Raydium compensated affected liquidity providers and moved authority to a multisig with timelocks. The distinction matters: this was an operational key-management failure inside a supposedly trustless system, which is a category of risk users cannot audit from the contract code.

Reading the liquidity honestly

Depth on SOL and major pairs is real. On freshly launched tokens, a pool showing significant liquidity may be a single provider who can withdraw it, and volume figures on memecoin pairs frequently reflect bot activity rather than organic demand. Before trading a new listing, check who holds the LP position and whether it is locked or burned — that is the difference between a market and a trap.

Who should use Raydium

Traders seeking early access to Solana assets, who understand that they are operating at the least vetted end of any market in crypto. For established pairs, Orca offers cleaner liquidity provision and Jupiter will route you to the best price anyway. Use Raydium deliberately for what it is good at, not as a default.

FAQ

Was Raydium hacked?
Yes. In December 2022 an attacker obtained pool owner authority and drained about $4.4m. Liquidity providers were compensated and authority was moved to a multisig with timelocks.
What are Raydium's fees?
Around 0.25% on standard pools, with lower tiers on concentrated liquidity pools. Solana network fees add a fraction of a cent.
Is it safe to buy new tokens on Raydium?
The venue works; the assets are the risk. Check whether the liquidity position is locked or burned and how concentrated holdings are — an unlocked LP means the provider can withdraw the market you are trading into.
Raydium or Orca?
Raydium for new listings and the long tail; Orca for cleaner concentrated liquidity provision and a better LP experience on established pairs.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1UniswapDeep, dependable swaps on Ethereum and its L2s0.01–1% per pool, set by tier8.9
21inchCross-venue routing on EVM chainsNo protocol fee on classic swaps; resolvers price Fusion orders8.3
3JupiterBest-execution routing on SolanaNo protocol swap fee; you pay route costs and price impact8.2
4Curve FinanceLarge stablecoin and pegged-asset swaps~0.01–0.04% on stable pools8.1
5PancakeSwapBNB Chain liquidity and cheap retail swaps0.01–0.25% per pool8.1
6AerodromeBase-native liquidityVariable per pool, typically 0.01–0.3%7.8
7OrcaClean concentrated-liquidity provision on Solana0.01–0.3% by pool tier7.8
8VelodromeOptimism and Superchain liquidityVariable per pool, typically 0.01–0.3%7.6
9OsmosisCosmos ecosystem trading0.05–0.3% typical7.5
10BalancerCustom-weight pools and LST liquiditySet per pool, commonly 0.05–1%7.3
11RaydiumNew Solana token liquidity~0.25% standard pools, lower on concentrated7.2
12Trader JoeAvalanche liquidity and volatility-aware LPingDynamic bin fees, typically 0.05–0.8%7.2
13THORChainNative cross-chain swaps without wrappingDynamic slip-based fee, typically 0.1–1%7.0
14CamelotArbitrum launches and long-tail pairsDynamic, typically 0.1–0.6%6.9
15SushiSwapWide chain coverage on a familiar interface0.3% classic pools; lower on v3 tiers6.9