7.9
Solid
Best Cross-Chain Bridges · Review

Stargate

Delivers native assets rather than wrappers from deep unified pools, on top of LayerZero's configurable trust model.

Best For
Unified liquidity transfers of native assets
Headline Cost
~0.06% plus gas
Founded
2022
Rank in category
11 of 15
Last Checked
August 2026
The short answer

Stargate delivers the real asset on the destination chain rather than a bridge wrapper, with unified pools deep enough for institutional-size transfers. It is a large concentrated pool of value secured by a configurable messaging layer, which is precisely the profile bridge attackers look for.

Score breakdown

Category rubric →
Trust assumptions · 30%
6.5
Exploit history · 25%
9.0
Settlement speed · 15%
8.5
Chain coverage · 15%
8.5
Cost · 15%
7.5

Works well for a specific use case, weaker outside it. The headline 7.9 is the weighted mean of these marks — see our methodology. Not financial advice.

What we liked

  • Receives native USDC or USDT rather than a bridge wrapper
  • Deep pooled liquidity supports large transfers
  • No exploit of its own contracts to date

Where it falls short

  • Security ultimately depends on LayerZero's verification configuration
  • Pooled liquidity is a large concentrated target

Wrapped assets are a persistent annoyance and a persistent risk: you receive a representation whose value depends on the bridge remaining solvent, and unwinding it later costs another transaction. Stargate's unified liquidity pools let you receive native USDC or USDT directly.

How unified liquidity works

Each supported asset has a single shared pool spanning all chains, rather than separate pools per route. That concentrates depth, which means large transfers execute without the slippage that fragmented liquidity would cause, and it concentrates risk in the same place.

The security position

Stargate's own contracts have not been exploited. Its messaging security is LayerZero's, which depends on how the application configures its verifier networks. A large pooled balance behind a configurable verification layer is the classic bridge risk profile, and it is the reason this scores 6.5 on trust assumptions despite a clean record.

Cost and coverage

Around 0.06% plus gas, with support across the major EVM chains and a growing set beyond. Transfers are fast, typically completing within a minute or two.

Who should use it

Users moving size in stablecoins who need native assets on the destination chain. For USDC specifically, CCTP achieves the same outcome without any pooled collateral, and is the safer route where both are available.

FAQ

Does Stargate give me wrapped tokens?
No. Its unified pools deliver the native asset on the destination chain, so there is nothing to unwrap later.
What secures Stargate?
LayerZero messaging, with security depending on the verifier configuration, plus Stargate's own contracts, which have not been exploited.
Is Stargate good for large transfers?
Yes — unified liquidity pools provide the depth for size without significant slippage, which fragmented per-route pools cannot.
Stargate or CCTP for USDC?
CCTP, where available: it achieves native USDC delivery with no pooled collateral to attack.
#ServiceBest forCostScore
1Across ProtocolFast, cheap EVM transfers with relayer-borne risk~0.05–0.2% depending on route8.9
2Circle CCTPMoving USDC without a wrapperFree protocol-level; gas only on most routes8.9
3IBCTrust-minimised transfers within CosmosGas only8.9
4deBridgeFast cross-chain swaps with no wrapped assets~0.04% plus gas8.5
5Hop ProtocolFast rollup-to-rollup transfers~0.04–0.1% plus bonder fee8.3
6HyperlanePermissionless deployment to new chainsGas plus relayer fee8.1
7LayerZeroBroadest omnichain messaging coverageSet by each application on top8.0
8AxelarProof-of-stake secured general messagingGas plus network fee7.9
9Chainlink CCIPInstitutional messaging with an independent risk layerPer-message fee, varies by route7.9
10Orbiter FinanceCheap L2-to-L2 transfersSmall flat fee per transfer7.9
11StargateUnified liquidity transfers of native assets~0.06% plus gas7.9
12SquidOne-click cross-chain swapsAxelar fees plus swap costs7.7
13Synapse ProtocolStablecoin transfers across many EVM chains~0.05–0.1% plus gas7.6
14Celer cBridgeCheap transfers across a long chain list~0.04–0.1%7.2
15WormholeSolana-to-EVM transfers at scaleGas plus relayer cost7.0